Vivek Mistry 👋

I’m a Certified Senior Laravel Developer with 8+ years of experience , specializing in building robust APIs and admin panels, frontend templates converting them into fully functional web applications.

Book A Call
  • 27 Dec, 2025
  • 363 Views
  • Stop guessing where to put authorization logic. Choose the right tool every time.

Policies vs Gates in Laravel — The Practical Difference Developers Actually Need

🚀 The Confusion Most Developers Have

Laravel gives us two authorization tools:

  • Gates
  • Policies

Most developers ask:

“Which one should I use?”

And often the answer online is:

“Policies for models, Gates for everything else.”

That’s technically true, but not very helpful.

Let’s break it down in a practical, real-project way.

🎯 What Gates Are Really For

Think of Gates as simple, global permission checks.

They are best when:

  • there is no specific model
  • the rule is generic
  • the logic is simple
  • you want a quick yes/no answer

Example: Admin Access

Gate::define('access-admin-panel', function ($user) {
    return $user->is_admin;
});

Usage:

abort_unless(Gate::allows('access-admin-panel'), 403);

This is perfect because:

  • no model is involved
  • rule applies app-wide
  • logic is simple

🧠 Real Use Cases for Gates

Use Gates when you’re checking things like:

  • Can user access admin panel?
  • Can user view analytics dashboard?
  • Can user manage application settings?
  • Is user a super-admin?
  • Is feature enabled for this user?

If your logic answers:

“Can the user do X?”
without involving a specific record — Gate is ideal.

🎯 What Policies Are Really For

Policies are for model-specific authorization.

They shine when:

  • permissions depend on data ownership
  • logic varies per record
  • rules are tied to a model
  • you want clean, organized authorization

Example: Post Ownership

class PostPolicy
{
    public function update(User $user, Post $post)
    {
        return $post->user_id === $user->id;
    }
}

Usage:

$this->authorize('update', $post);

This reads naturally:

“Authorize updating this post.”

🧠 Real Use Cases for Policies

Use Policies when you’re checking:

  • Can user edit this post?
  • Can user delete this order?
  • Can user view this invoice?
  • Can user cancel this booking?
  • Can user update this profile?

If your logic answers:

“Can the user do X to this record?”
Policy is the right choice.

⚖️ The Real Practical Difference (No Theory)

Here’s the mental shortcut most senior Laravel devs use:

  • Is there a model instance involved?
  • → Use Policy
  • Is this a global rule or feature access?
  • → Use Gate

🚫 Common Mistakes Developers Make

❌ Using Gates for model ownership

Gate::define('edit-post', function ($user, $post) {
    return $post->user_id === $user->id;
});

This works — but becomes messy as rules grow.

❌ Putting global logic inside Policies

public function accessAdmin(User $user)
{
    return $user->is_admin;
}

This doesn’t belong to a model — Gate is cleaner.


🧩 How They Work Together (Best Practice)

Real projects often use both:

  • Gates → feature-level access
  • Policies → record-level access

Example:

Gate::allows('access-admin-panel');   // global
$this->authorize('update', $post);    // record-based

This separation keeps your authorization:

  • readable
  • scalable
  • easy to debug

🏁 Final Thought

Policies and Gates are not competitors — they are partners.

The key is not what Laravel allows, but what keeps your code clean.

If you remember just one thing:

Gates answer “Can the user do this?”
Policies answer “Can the user do this to THIS record?”

Once you follow this rule, your authorization logic will feel natural instead of confusing.

Share: